Topic: Finanças Públicas

Accelerating Community Investment

Contact

ACI Team
aci@lincolninst.edu

Accelerating Community Investment (ACI) improves public finance by creating opportunities for public development, housing, and infrastructure finance agencies to engage with philanthropies, mission-aligned investors, and the broader capital markets. These partnerships help create new, community-led investments in underserved places and people.

ACI seeks to increase the availability of capital in the right places, at the right times, and for the right purposes. The initiative comprises field research, a national community of practice, and technical assistance and support for participants to develop and deploy impactful mission-aligned investment opportunities. These opportunities create a more fertile environment for investment in community and economic development, housing, and more, benefiting residents and communities. ACI also works with public finance agencies, community capital conduits, and impact-aligned investors to further develop the community investment ecosystem.

About ACI

Through research and a community of practice, ACI explores the intersection of public finance, capital providers, impact investors, and community—enabling those actors to more deeply  influence the profound multilevel systems change needed to achieve greater opportunity for people in place by:

  • Strengthening the connection of impact investors to public economic development, housing finance, and/or community development finance
  • Optimizing impact investing portfolios for various asset holder types
  • Boosting positive impact of capital on people in place across the national community investment ecosystem

Watch this panel discussion on the origins and goals of ACI featuring Lincoln Institute CEO and President George W. “Mac” McCarthy, Lincoln Institute Senior Fellow and ACI Director Robert J. “R.J.” McGrail, and former FB Heron Foundation President Dana Bezerra.

Our Work

National Community of Practice

We connect participants in local community investment ecosystems to each other and to their peers elsewhere through a community of practice that includes 100 agencies and institutions from 18 states. The group meets both virtually and in person to build partnerships, identify new investment opportunities, and share experiences and advice.

Training, Coaching, and Technical Assistance

ACI has provided significant virtual and in-person coaching, education, and learning beyond the community of practice, exposing participants to new knowledge and tools that increase their effectiveness and impact.

Local Investor Challenges

ACI hosts local investor challenges to spotlight community investment opportunities and enable participants to develop and share new, community-driven opportunities to impact investors and catalytic capital holders. Four initial sessions—held in Atlanta, Cincinnati, New Orleans, and Austin—have allowed participants to pitch investment-ready projects to local investors and receive direct feedback from potential investors.

Community of Practice

At the heart of this is a national community of practice of community and institutional leaders, who will build partnerships, receive training and technical assistance, and identify new investment opportunities. Current participants are listed below.

 

Introduction

Topics

Land value capture, social housing, infrastructure

Timeframe

1970–2018

Learning Goals

  • Identify the economic and social forces that led to the establishment of the Água Espraiada Urban Operation in São Paulo.
  • Examine the national and local policy reforms that created the framework for the design and implementation of solutions.
  • Explore the tensions resulting from conflicting interests and motivations of residents, real estate developers, and city officials involved in redeveloping informal settlements.
  • Compare and contrast the benefits and limitations of traditional strategies (i.e., local taxes and fees) versus land value capture strategies (i.e., sale of development rights) for raising revenue to fund large-scale infrastructure projects.
  • Evaluate the outcomes of the Água Espraiada Urban Operation and identify ways the program realized or did not realize its original vision.

Primary Audience

  • Municipal officials and administrators from cities confronting challenges and opportunities for large-scale infrastructure projects involving real estate development pressure and informal settlements.
  • Staff of NGOs and community organizations involved in providing social housing and upgrading informal settlements.
  • Policy makers and advocates interested in using land value capture to help finance public infrastructure and social housing.

Prerequisite Knowledge

None.

Summary

Financing A City’s Vision: The Social Mobilization of Land Values in São Paulo is a four-part documentary series created by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy that explores a large-scale infrastructure project called the Água Espraiada Urban Operation in São Paulo, Brazil. Urban operations allow Brazilian cities to recapture the land value generated by land use changes and public investment. São Paulo employed a unique financing tool, certificates of additional construction potential (CePACs), which are tradable development rights sold at public auctions. Featuring the voices of favela residents, city officials, real estate professionals, and a range of academics, the series examines the Água Espraiada Urban Operation from multiple perspectives.

These videos contain dialogue in both English and Portuguese. Subtitles are available in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Click the “CC” button in the video player to enable subtitles.

Chapter 1: Development and Displacement

The first chapter of this four-part series covers the decades leading up to the creation of the Água Espraiada Urban Operation—a large-scale infrastructure and densification project in São Paulo, Brazil. The video highlights three forces shaping the city during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s: the growth of informal “favela” communities, traffic congestion, and growing interest in the area’s real estate. When Mayor Paulo Maluf initiated a project to build a road along the Água Espraiada stream in 1991, a decade before the urban operation was established, thousands of favela residents were evicted and the city was plunged into debt. From this context, the idea for the Água Espraiada Urban Operation emerged. How might a city accomplish large-scale urban interventions without displacing residents or taking on debt?

Chapter 2: An Innovative Solution

The second chapter of the series explains what an “urban operation” is, how CePACs work, and the inspiration behind these unique tools for major urban development projects. Community activism and a receptive administration in City Hall allowed a provision for social housing and services to be included in the list of interventions. A legal tool called special zones of social interest, or ZEIS, gave favela residents the right to housing on specific pieces of land.

Chapter 3: The Fight to Stay

In the third chapter of this four-part series, residents of the Jardim Edite favela community fight for their right to stay as powerful economic forces threaten to displace them. The first auctions of CePACs are held, raising money for the famous cable-stayed Estaiada Bridge, but it’s unclear whether money will be spent on the community’s promised social housing units.

Chapter 4: Reflection and Renewal

The final chapter of the series brings us to the present. The video reflects on the dramatic transformation that has taken place since the urban operation was established in 2001, much of it funded through CePACs. The urban operation still has much to do to achieve its ambitious goals: the road needs to be extended and social housing for thousands of families needs to be built. As the city contemplates holding more CePAC auctions, social housing advocates work to ensure that funding is available.

Exhibits

References

Barbosa, Eliana Rosa De Queiroz, et al. 2019. “Expectant Territories and Urban Instruments: The Case of Urban Operation Água Branca.” Rev. Bras. Estud. Urbanos Reg. 21(2) (Maio-Ago): 451–71. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbeur/a/ffchSrgY6CPMTdnjfQhXw4c/?lang=en

Biderman, Ciro, et al. 2006. “Large-Scale Urban Interventions: The Case of Faria Lima in São Paulo.” Land Lines (April), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: 8–13. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/large-scale-urban-inte…

Caldeira, Teresa, and James Holston. 2005. “State and Urban Space in Brazil: From Modernist Planning to Democratic Interventions.” Global Anthropology: Technology, Governmentality, Ethics. London: Blackwell: 393–416.

Fernandes, Edésio. 2011. Regularization of Informal Settlements in Latin America. Policy Focus Report. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/policy-focus-reports/regulariza…

Kim, Julie. “CePACs and Their Value Capture Viability in the U.S. for Infrastructure Funding.” 2018. Working Paper No. WP18JK1. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy., https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/cepacs-their-val…

Mahendra, Anjali, et al. 2020. “Urban Land Value Capture in São Paulo, Addis Ababa, and Hyderabad: Differing Interpretations, Equity Impacts, and Enabling Conditions.” Working Paper No. WP20MA1. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (January) https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/urban-land-value…

Marcio, Fortes, and Billy Cobbett. 2010. The City Statute of Brazil: A Commentary. Cities Alliance and Ministry of Cities. Brazil., https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/CA_Images/CityStatute…

Ribeiro, Silvio Cesar Lima, et al. 2016. “ZEIS Maps: Comparing Areas to Be Earmarked Exclusively for Social Housing in São Paulo City.” Land Use Policy 58(44667): 445–55. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. (December 15) doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.010

Sandroni, Paulo. 2011. “Urban Value Capture in São Paulo Using a Two-Part Approach.” Working Paper No. WP11PS1. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy., https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/urban-value-capt…

Sandroni, Paulo Henrique. 2011. “Recent Experience with Land Value Capture in São Paulo, Brazil.” Land Lines (July): 14–19., https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/recent-experience-land…

Siqueira, Marina Toneli. 2019. “New Urban Policies, New Forms of Social Participation? The Challenges of the Água Espraiada Urban Consortium Operation in São Paulo, Brazil.” Cadernos Metrópole 21(45) (May/August): 417–38.

Smolka, Martim O. 2013. Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development. Policy Focus Report. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policyhttps://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/policy-focus-reports/implementi…

Somekh, Nadia, and Cintia Marino. 2012.“São Paulo Planning History: From Sanitarism to Strategic Project.” Paper presented at the 15th International Planning History Society Conference, São Paulo, Brazil. http://www.usp.br/fau/iphs/abstractsAndPapersFiles/Sessions/31/SOMEKH_MA…

SP Urbanismo and Cidade de São Paulo. 2020. Operação Urbana Consorciada Água Espraiada Sumário. https://gestaourbana.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/cadernos_ou…

Yu-Hung, Hong, and Gregory K. Ingram. Municipal Revenues and Land Policies (proceedings of the 2009 Land Policy Conference). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/books/municipal-revenues-land-p…

Course

Financiación Urbana y Políticas de Suelo

Abril 10, 2024 - Abril 13, 2024

Offered in espanhol


El curso de Financiación Urbana y Políticas de Suelo examina las alternativas que ofrecen la gestión del suelo y la movilización de plusvalías para atender algunos de los principales desafíos que enfrentan los gobiernos subnacionales, como son la financiación de infraestructuras de movilidad y la provisión de vivienda asequible. Se centra en la experiencia colombiana analizada en el contexto de América Latina, y combina la discusión de aspectos conceptuales interdisciplinarios con la revisión de experiencias y casos de estudio.

El curso, además, promueve espacios de debate, análisis comparativos, aproximaciones al enfoque de desarrollo urbano orientado al transporte sostenible (DOT), y ejercicios de medición de las plusvalías y sus posibilidades de movilización, al tiempo que analiza los principales instrumentos de planificación y gestión en el marco de la financiación basada en el valor del suelo que han sido aplicados en Colombia. En el último día del curso se realizará una visita técnica para observar proyectos de movilidad, gestión del suelo, y vivienda de interés social en la ciudad de Bogotá.

Relevancia 

Las ciudades de América Latina y el Caribe enfrentan grandes desafíos para orientar y financiar sus procesos de desarrollo urbano, ante los cuales la planeación territorial y el fortalecimiento de fuentes de financiación basada en el valor del suelo ameritan especial atención y consideración.

Colombia es uno de los países en la región que cuenta con marcos legales que proporcionan una base para la implementación de instrumentos de gestión y financiación base suelo. La experiencia colombiana permite identificar y evaluar avances, aprendizajes y alternativas para aportar a la discusión sobre el uso de estos instrumentos en América Latina. El curso aborda el potencial de los instrumentos en relación con dos aspectos específicos: la movilidad y el acceso a vivienda asequible, en el marco de la planeación territorial en Colombia.

Detalles de la convocatoria


Details

Date
Abril 10, 2024 - Abril 13, 2024
Application Period
Janeiro 9, 2024 - Fevereiro 11, 2024
Selection Notification Date
Fevereiro 21, 2024 at 11:59 PM
Language
espanhol
Educational Credit Type
Lincoln Institute certificate

Keywords

Mitigação Climática, Meio Ambiente, Habitação, Regulação dos Mercados Fundiários, Uso do Solo, Planejamento de Uso do Solo, Valor da Terra, Tributação Imobiliária, Temas Legais, Governo Local, Saúde Fiscal Municipal, Planejamento, Finanças Públicas, Políticas Públicas, Desenvolvimento Orientado ao Transporte, Transporte, Urbano, Desenvolvimento Urbano

Oportunidades de bolsas

2024 Lincoln Institute Scholars Program

Submission Deadline: March 8, 2024 at 11:59 PM

This program provides an opportunity for recent PhDs (one to two years post-graduate) specializing in public finance or urban economics to work with senior academics.

Lincoln Institute Scholars will be invited to the institute for a program on April 18–20, 2024, that will include:

• presentations by a panel of journal editors on the academic publication process;

• a workshop in which senior scholars comment on draft papers written by the Lincoln Institute Scholars;

• an opportunity for the Lincoln Institute Scholars to present their research; and

• a seminar in which leading scholars in public finance and urban economics present their latest research.

For information on previous Lincoln Scholars, please visit Lincoln Scholars Program Alumni.


Details

Submission Deadline
March 8, 2024 at 11:59 PM


Downloads


Keywords

Economia, Tributação Imobiliária, Finanças Públicas

Accelerating Community Investment Launches Second Community of Practice

By Kristina McGeehan, Novembro 28, 2023

 

The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy launched the second round of the Accelerating Community Investment initiative’s Community of Practice (ACI CoP) in November, kicking off with a convening in Sante Fe, New Mexico. ACI improves the practice of public finance by creating opportunities for public development, housing, and infrastructure finance agencies to engage in skill building and peer learning with philanthropies, mission-aligned investors, and the broader capital markets, with the goal of increasing investment and its impact on communities across the nation. 

Through this initiative, the Lincoln Institute connects participants in local community investment ecosystems to each other and their peers elsewhere—helping to form partnerships that create new, community-led investments in underserved places and people. The ACI CoP, first launched in 2021 with approximately 40 agencies and institutions from 14 states, has expanded to 100 participants now representing 18 states across the country. 

“My team’s participation in the Lincoln Institute’s ACI CoP over the past three years has been transformational,” said Laura N. Brunner, president and CEO of the Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority. “It is difficult to say whether the education or the relationship building has been more impactful, because both far exceeded our expectations. The technical content contributes to our ability to move from ‘good to great,’ and the friendships and perspectives of fellow members allow us to benchmark ourselves against others and enjoy the comfort of safe spaces to learn.” 

ACI seeks to increase the availability of capital in the right places, at the right times, and for the right purposes. The initiative includes field research, a national CoP focused on peer learning and skill development, and technical assistance and support for participants to develop and deploy impactful mission-aligned investment opportunities. These opportunities create a more fertile environment for investment in community and economic development, housing, and more, for the benefit of residents and communities.  

“Our work in ACI, focusing on deepening the skills of public finance practitioners and creating connections with values-aligned impact capital holders, is helping to drive new investments that improve the quality of life in underserved communities across the country,” said Robert J. “R.J.” McGrail, senior fellow at the Lincoln Institute and initiative director for ACI. “These public finance leaders not only have the capacity to tap large pools of capital and leverage public funding, but they can also help impact-minded and values-aligned investors channel new capital to communities where it will create deeper impact.” 

“Over the last few years in the Accelerating Community Investment initiative, we’ve seen the benefits of bringing together new civic coalitions to tackle local problems,” said George W. McCarthy, president and CEO of the Lincoln Institute. “Whether we’re trying to meet the challenge of supplying adequate affordable shelter to residents, preparing to support a low- or no-carbon fleet, or adapting our cities to endure the climate crisis, we need unprecedented multisectoral cooperation to deploy unprecedented volumes of financial and human resources. When the public, private, and civic sectors bring their respective knowledge, discipline, and creativity together, the results can be magical.”   

More information about ACI and a complete list of CoP participants can be found on the Lincoln Institute’s website


Kristina McGeehan is director of communications at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Government Finance Data

This section reports data which put the property tax in the overall context of state and local finances. It contains data for 10 years – 2018 (estimated), 2017, 2016 (estimated), 2015 (estimated), 2014 (estimated), 2013 (estimated), 2012, 2011 (estimated), 2010 (estimated), and 2009 (estimated). The tables display data for state and local governments combined, and for state and local governments separately. For each year and each type of government, tables show data for each revenue source in nominal dollars, as a share of all revenues, per capita, and as a percent of personal income. These data come from the U.S. Census Bureau and can be accessed through the Bureau’s State and Local Government Finances Datasets and Tables directory. Revenue sources are defined in Chapter 4 of the U.S. Census Bureau 2006 Classification Manual.

2021

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2021
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2021
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2021

2020

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2020
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2020
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2020

2019

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2019
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2019
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2019

2018

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2018
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2018
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2018

2017

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2017
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2017
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2017

2016

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2016
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2016
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2016

2015

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2015
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2015
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2015

2014

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2014
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2014
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2014

2013

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2013
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2013
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2013

2012

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2012
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2012
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2012

2011

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2011
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2011
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2011

2010

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State, 2010
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2010
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2010

2009

Summary — Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2009
Summary — State and Local Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2009
Summary — State Property Tax Revenue, by State – 2009

General Tables

2021

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2021
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2021
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2021
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2021
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2021
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2021
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2021
Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2020
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2020
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2020
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2020
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2020
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2020
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2020

2019

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2019
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2019
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2019
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2019
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2019
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2019
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2019

2018

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2018
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2018
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2018
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2018
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2018
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2018
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2018

2017

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2017
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2017
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2017
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2017
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2017
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2017
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2017

2016

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2016
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2016
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2016
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2016
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2016
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2016
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2016

2015

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2015
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2015
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2015
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2015
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2015
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2015
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2015

2014

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2014
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2014
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2014
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2014
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2014
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2014
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2014

2013

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2013
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2013
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2013
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2013
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2013
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2013
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2013

2012

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2012
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2012
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2012
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2012
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2012
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2012
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2012

2011

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2011
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2011
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2011
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2011
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2011
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2011
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2011

2010

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2010
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2010
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2010
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2010
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2010
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2010
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2010

2009

Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2009
Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2009
Percentage Distribution of Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
Percentage Distribution of State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
Percentage Distribution of State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
State and Local General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2009
State and Local General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
State and Local General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2009
State General Revenues as a Percent of Personal Income by Source, by State, 2009
State General Revenues by Source, by State, 2009
State General Revenues Per Capita by Source, by State, 2009

Access Property Tax Database

Property Tax Fundamentals

This section covers the basic property tax structure established by each state, including definitions of real property; treatment of personal property; and transfer charges imposed when properties change hands. States may also set limits on rates, on assessment increases (for example, some states freeze property value until property changes hands), on the amount the property tax levy may increase from year to year, and on the total revenues collected or expenditures made during the year. This section includes local property tax rates, as reported by the states.

 


 

The Property Tax Base

The property tax base starts with monetary values that are placed on taxable property by the taxing authority. All states recognize market value (also sometimes called true value, just value, or actual value) as a standard for assessment, though not all states strictly apply that standard. Many states do not allow taxation of the full value of property, but rather apply assessment ratios to reduce values before the tax rate is applied. Some states classify property by its use, with different tax rates or assessment ratios for different classes of property.

 


 

Property Tax Relief and Incentive Programs

All states have tax provisions to encourage particular land uses and to provide property tax relief to selected classes of owners. Property tax relief and incentive programs are grouped here according to their objectives and structure. They include tax relief to residential property owners, provisions to encourage economic development, to reduce taxes on certain types of property (e.g., agricultural or open space), and programs to encourage specific types of property improvement. They may offer relief by applying a different value standard (e.g., use value) or through exemptions, credits, or deferral of payments.

 


 

State-by-State Property Tax in Detail

The state-by-state property tax in detail presents key features of the property tax system in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Most of the material in this section is also available in other tables on the site. However, there is additional information here on the number of taxing authorities in each state, assessment administration practices in each state, and on organizations or properties that are completely exempt from the property tax.